No Veto: Fair Share Repeal Proceeds Despite ACA Delay
07/15/2013 - Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Attorney : Kristin G. McGurn
 On July 11, 2013, Governor Patrick reported that he will not block repeal of 
the Massachusetts Employer Fair Share Contribution pursuant to M.G.L. c. 149, ˜ 
188, despite the Obama Administrationfs announcement that implementation of the 
large employer mandate under the Affordable Care Act will be delayed for a year, 
until January 1, 2015. Since its historic passage in 2006, the Fair Share 
Employer Contribution under ˜ 188 required employers with more than ten 
Massachusetts workers to make a timely offer of subsidized health insurance to 
gfull-timeh employees or pay a $295 penalty per full time equivalent. The 
similar ACA employer mandate requires employers with 50 or more employees to 
provide affordable coverage within particular timeframes to certain employees in 
order to avoid more significant penalties of $2,000 or $3,000. Our discussion 
the ACAfs employer mandate can be found in our Health Care Reform Management 
Alert Series, issues 45, 48, 58 and 67 and available on our ACA Resource Center highlighted 
here. In a surprise announcement by a Treasury department official on July 2, 
2013, implementation of the ACA employer mandate was delayed. This announcement 
followed by one day the Massachusetts Senatefs passage of the repeal of ˜ 188 
Fair Share Employer Contributions, effective immediately, in connection with the 
Commonwealthfs 2014 Budget. The Governor signed the Budget Friday, July 12, 
2013.
 On January 11, 2013, we reported here, that the Patrick Administration sponsored the bill 
calling for Fair Share repeal, in part due to the recognition that the ACAfs 
similar employer mandates would render employer compliance with the dual schemes 
onerous, and potentially result in duplicative penalties. It was anticipated 
that the repeal would result in a modest window - between July 2013 and January 
2014 - during which the employer mandate to offer health insurance was 
eliminated. That period now stretches through January 2015.
 As a result of the ACA employer mandate delay, employer shared 
responsibility payments will not be assessed for 2014 (but other components of 
ACA implementation scheduled to take effect in 2014 are expected to move 
forward, see issues 67 and 69). Discussing his decision not to veto despite the ACA 
delay, the Governor expressed his belief that in Massachusetts, where there is 
near-universal coverage already, employers who have adopted health insurance 
programs after half a dozen years of robust regulatory enforcement - in lieu of 
paying Fair Share Contributions and as a tool to attract and retain employees - 
will maintain these insurance offerings until the federal employer mandatefs new 
effective date despite the absence of the preexisting regulatory 
requirements.  In the face of pressure from certain constituencies that 
sought to reinstate Fair Share following the announcement of delay in federal 
implementation and enforcement, Governor Patrick confirmed that he stands behind 
this revocation of ˜ 188, which served in some ways as a precursor to federal 
reform. Discussing the repeal, the Governor pointed out that the Medical 
Security Program, which covers individuals receiving unemployment compensation 
in Massachusetts, remains in place until January. A per employee surcharge will 
remain thereafter, in the form of an gemployer responsibility contributionh to 
subsidize health insurance.
 Employers should note that the legislation that repealed ˜ 188 makes clear 
that the Division of Unemployment Assistance, to which the Fair Share Unit (FSU) 
has reported over the years, will retain authority to collect any outstanding 
fair share employer contributions established pursuant to ˜ 188 for obligations 
arising prior to July 1, 2013. The FSU will remain in place to account for 
employer liabilities through June 30, 2013 and collection of these amounts will 
be conducted in accordance with previously promulgated regulations. Accordingly, 
employers should expect DUA to continue enforcement activity, pursue audits, and 
seek to collect liabilities for filing quarters through DUAfs Q3 2013 filing 
period.  
Copyright © 2013 Seyfarth Shaw LLP.